Sunday, March 20, 2011

The Doctor Can See You Now

So, I was in to see my doctor again last week, and I happened to have my Hip book with me, this is how that conversation went:
“What are you reading,” asked my doctor, sounding actually interested not just polite conversation before we got to the other stuff.
“Oh, just something I’m reading in one of my English classes, the history of hip,” I said not wanting to really talk about my homework.
“Hip, do you mean like in a hip,” as she points to the outside of her body, just below the waste. I chuckled thinking this is exactly the answer you would expect from ones doctor.
“No, like hip, cool, popular culture,” I answered.
“So what about it,” she asks.
I really didn’t feel like going into details, it has taken me weeks to understand what the hell is going on in this class, and I kept thinking, don’t these doctors charge by the hour. Pre coffee, and trying not to get annoyed, wishing I wouldn’t have brought the book with me, even though we all know that waiting rooms have nothing good to read, I said:
“You know, like what makes something hip, identity, knowledge, language, the perpetual present,” I said hoping she would find the subject uninteresting compared to boils, diarrhea, and puss. Her answered surprised me.
“I definitely think that hip is like the perpetual present, hip is what is in right now. You know what is hip right now, rude people and selfishness. These are the attitudes people have adopted because it is cool to act this way. That is just my opinion.”
My doctor, a college graduate, with a PhD in family medicine, she thinks it is hip to act like an ass. Is this why we have so much road rage, why people continue to text and talk on their cell phones even though they know the dangers. This is why we get mad when we don’t get our way, how we think the world belongs to us, and we just allow others to live in our space. If she is right, I hope this fad dies out with beehive hair dos, parachute pants, and Justin Bieber (he has had his fifteen minutes, right?). Being the perpetual optimist I hope that the next stage of hip is compassion and kindness (okay, I know, yuck, but you know what I’m saying, right?).



Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Bamboozled

Who Is Tricking Who?
At first Pierre Delacroix is presented as the “trickster” in the movie Bamboozled. He is fed up with the station he works for, CNS and its inability to see that he is trying to produce television that represents the African American community as it is, not as it is portrayed. After numerous attempts and rejections he tries to “trick” the station into doing a racist show that is based off of the old minstrel shows. He is sure that they will deem it too racist and in the end he will be let go from the network. But, the trick is on him.
Ultimately the trickster in this movie never actually appears on camera it is the man behind the scenes, the creator Spike Lee. Who is he tricking? Everyone that watches the movie! A minstrel show within a minstrel show is what he has created.
Why? Lee is trying to tell the American public that things have not changed much in the entertainment industry. African Americans are still being portrayed as stereotypes. While the viewers watch in horror at Lee’s production of the minstrel show he uses the Mau Maus to make his point. They are seen as violent, materialistic, alcoholics, rappers. This is the negative image that is sold to the white American audience.
Think about it. There are very few African American families portrayed in a non-stereotypical light on television, movies, or the music industry today. The reason behind this; is either the networks don’t buy these shows, or America doesn’t watch them. Look at the ratings for these shows or movies, and the amount of money they gross are considerably less than the others. Of course I’m talking about today’s shows, not the few that did well in the 70’s and 80’s like Sanford and Sons, The Jeffersons, and The Cosby Show, these may be seen as the exception to the rules.
Lee was trying to open the eyes of the American audience to show them that racism is still a concern in this country, and that we are still allowing the stereotypical identity of the African American to entertain us.
I’m left with two questions:
1.      Is the rap industry another form of the minstrel show?
2.      Was the lack of success of the movie Bamboozled due to the fact that the white and black audience didn’t like being tricked into seeing a movie that may have spoken the truth about the entertainment industry, and its portrayal of African Americans still in today’s world?
John Leland in Hip: The History says, “The trickster brings enlightenment” (166), Spike Lee does that in Bamboozled.

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Hip In My Home

Essay 1 - The Hippest Person I Know:

I can hear the faint ringing of the bell when suddenly the high school’s double doors are shoved open wide and teenagers come pouring out in noisy groups. These kids all look the same in their too tight jeans and jelly rolls gathered about their middles, hair long and unwashed, with the look of indifference on their faces. As the clouds in the sky move to cover the sun, he appears in the shadows of the doorway, my teenage son Liam.

 He makes his way across the parking lot like a character from a 1940’s pulp fiction film. He moves in two different speeds, one slow and careful, as each fiber and muscle of his body progresses with a specific reason. His dark eyes blanketed in thick lashes quickly take in his surroundings. His senses are heightened and they can detect the flaws in the people around him.

His strides are long and his hands are hidden in his pockets, as if he draws himself in tightly, to avoid the gossip, games, and most importantly the physical interaction with his peers. You can almost see him dressed in a long dark coat and fedora, but he is dressed like a modern day rebel, dark jeans, a dark t-shirt that bares the emblem of rock gods from decades before he was born, a music that speaks the truth to his soul. Liam’s clothes establish a young man that yearns for functionality and individualism over trends that come and go, one who looks put together, but stands out from the crowd in defiance over what the masses think is cool. Liam defines what has always been hip, the rebel, the nonconformist, and the unconventional. His glasses fit tight up against his face, but they do not mask the knowledge in his eyes. He is aware of how others see him but he has the self-assurance, and the enlightenment to not care.

            As Liam gets into my car he says, “Hey Mom, how was your day,” always with his good manners on display. After I answer he says, “What’s for dinner?” I let him know that we are having dinner at Pizza Hut by ourselves tonight. “Cool” he says.

Once we arrive at the restaurant and after the waitress brings us our large pepperoni pizza, we each serve ourselves a slice of hot, gooey, greasy goodness; I start to explain to my son why I had lured him there. In my English class we are discussing John Leland’s book “Hip: The History,” and I wanted to talk about why I think Liam is the hippest person I know. He takes a brief pause from his pizza, he looks at me skeptically and says, “I’m not hip, you are the hippest person you know,” I ask him why he doesn’t think he’s hip. Liam says, “Because hip is cool, in, popular, fashionable, entertainment, the masses, and I’m none of these things.” I sit in silence for a moment just staring at him, curiously thinking about his modesty and his take on hip. Liam believes that hip is an external attribute someone has, I wonder if it’s the difference in our generations and the word hip has changed definitions since I was his age. I tell him I don’t think that hip is just a physical image, for me hip embodies a sense of knowledge and intellect. He shakes his long bangs out of his face and with a raised eyebrow says, “You’re crazy.”

            Sensing that Liam had no interest in having a conversation about the word hip, I changed the subject and asked him how school was going. As he started talking about his calculus class and how they were, “working on logarithms and how this allows you to find the negative inverse of an exponent,” I watch him in awe as his mind works its way around complicated reasoning.

Suddenly I imagine the Pizza Hut filling with a smoky haze and I can smell rich black coffee brewing in the distance. I look over to my son and he is wearing a black turtleneck sweater, a beret, and in his hands he is holding a book by Jack Kerouac, “On The Road,” I remember Kerouac describing the book as, “An Official Log of the Hip Generation,” (13). Liam is like the Beatnik Generation, instead of contemplating just social issues, war, and the most desired cannabis plant, he is thinking about string theory and quantum mechanics. His knowledge is unassuming, he does not feel superiority over anyone, Liam’s mind just works differently than most, and this is what makes him hip to me. Jon Leland in “Hip: The History” argues that hip is not about intelligence, he says, “Hip is not genius” (9), and Leland contradicts himself when he says, “It (hip) is always seeking a smarter way” (3), that is what geniuses like Liam are doing, trying to find a “smarter way” to make the world a better place to live in.

As I try to connect Liam to Kerouac and the Beatniks I realize that he rejects some of their ideas, especially when it comes to drugs creating an escape from reality. Instead he embraces the world of video games. Like Leland says, “Hips central romance, the myth of reinvention, is a quintessential male fantasy” (87), Liam’s fantasy is the technological world of gaming. Video gaming is a predominately masculine world with a violent and sexually charged atmosphere. Men like Liam develop a separate identity from themselves by taking on the characters within the gaming world. By doing this he lives out his fantasies of being someone other than himself; a soldier, a race car driver, or even a professional sports player. Gaming gives him the safety to act out his aggressions and always get the girl, in the safety of his own room. This allows him to escape from the mundane reality of his own life. And then I was brought back to my own reality when Liam asks, “Are you done with dinner and ready to go?”

In the car and on our way home Liam receives a text from a friend, wanting to know if he wants to go to a party with him. In an esoteric language that is only truly understood by Liam and his peers, he text back in what I call, broken cell phone language, words that I can only assume to mean, “Dude, No.” Leland says, “Technology allowed whites and blacks to engage each other through culture without crossing paths in real life” (85). I think technology today does the same thing, instead of it being about race, young people can engage each other without ever being in the same room together. Liam and his friends are taking the language of hip today, and communicating to a larger audience, at a faster rate of speed. His culture is bonded together by their consumption of technology and circulation of their knowledge. Liam and his friends are delivering their message of hip to the whole world. This makes me wonder how America’s early intellectual’s words would have spread if they had the use of today’s technology.

Before we reach home Liam tells me he is learning about Henry David Thoreau in English class. The evolution of technology makes me think of Liam sitting around a table with notable isolationists like Thoreau and the Dali Lama discussing the greater meaning of enlightenment. Leland says, “In relative isolation, a small group of individuals, forsaking the general trends around them, give each other permission to do something new” (69). Thoreau was part of the Transcendentalist Movement. Liam talks about Walden and how his isolation in nature helped to find awareness in one’s self. The Dali Lama reflects in “Many Ways to Nirvana” by saying, “Through meditation one can gain a clearer awareness: a clearer picture of reality” (3). Liam on the other hand isolates himself from the physical interaction of the community around him only to share his ideas on self-assurance and self-truths with the world on the internet. While I believe Leland is right when he says, “Hip requires an audience” (8), I don’t think the size of that audience matters. My son Liam however is sharing his ideas in a format larger than Thoreau or the Dali Lama, his audience is the whole world.

Like Thoreau, Walt Whitman and Ralph Waldo Emerson are men that Leland describes as “writers who set down the intellectual framework for hip, celebrating the individual and the nonconformist” (40). My son embodies these men; in their unorthodox way of thinking, like Walt Whitman says in “Song of Myself” “Nothing not God, is greater to one than one’s self” (36). The peer pressure of having a religious faith in our community could make one question their beliefs, but this does not affect Liam. He is true to himself and has the confidence to know he does not have to believe in a God as long as he believes in himself. Liam doesn’t feel as if he is completely unorthodox, but he fits somewhere in the middle between the norm and the freakish, he’s definitely not a sheep. Leland says, "hip operates in the joints and seams of a culture" (162), Liam lives between the cracks of society that defines hip.  

While John Leland thinks, “nonconformity is a dated word. In today’s splintered pop culture, it is hard to imagine a norm that anyone might conform to; the very notion is unhip” (115). This “notion” may be “unhip,” but the masses are still conforming to whatever is deemed popular, where Liam is following the same path as Emerson and Whitman; defying the collective masses by being hip enough to not conform to societies pressures. Liam is an individualist, not afraid to march to his own drummer, and defy the demands of his peers. He does not hide behind what is in fashion in order to mask his individuality. Liam does not wear urban hip-hop clothing, cut his hair to match the long shag made popular by Justin Bieber, or listen to Lady Gaga. He has little interest in parties, random sexually experiences, or is he concerned with high school’s social hierarchy. Liam conforms to nothing leaving his interests wide open to everything that the world has to offer. This outspoken attitude towards conformity classifies Liam as hip.

As we pull up to our house I tell Liam that I’m not done with my questions on how he feels about hip, and I proceed to follow him into his room. He sits on the edge of his bed strumming on his black Gibson Les Paul electric guitar. I faintly recognize the song he is playing as a Metallica song made famous in the late 80’s.

I hear his voice deepen and his speech slows as he tells me about his favorite music. I envision a cigarette hanging from the side of his mouth as his head tilts down towards his fingers watching himself play each chord; breathing next to him on his nightstand could be a two finger width of whiskey, neat, in a clear glass snifter. I feel as if I’ve been transported to a night club listening to one of the great blues and jazz guitarists like Lonnie Johnson or B.B. King speak to me. Singers and song writers who played the blues expressed their lifestyles, and the heartaches of others.

My son tells me why he listens to heavy metal and classical music. It’s not about the image either of these genres creates, it’s about how it makes him feel, how the music reaches into his soul and tells his story. Liam says, “The music I listen to reflects how I’m feeling each day.” He talks about the music he would like to create, and plays something that is a cross between hard hitting rock and the richer tones and harmonic sounds of classical music. It’s nothing like I’ve ever heard, it’s innovative, it’s fresh, it defines him, and it’s hip. Just like the blues and jazz musicians before him, he is trying to create a new movement to set himself apart from the mainstream of his generation. Liam’s music wants to enlighten society to the pressures and expectations they have put on him and his peers. Liam is not just another “White boy who stole the blues” (9), as Leland might suggest, and I disagree with Leland’s take on hip being about black or white. Music transcends race and gives us all a way to connect with one another. I’m brought back to the present by a skillful rendition of “Stairway to Heaven,” it makes me smile because I know Liam plays it to mock my generation, and as a sign to get lost.

I leave Liam’s room and sit at my desk with a better sense on how I define hip in the 21st century. My son is leading his generation towards a new sense of hip. His outward identity is both authentic and individual. His internal identity is one of a nonconformist, from the way he carries himself and his outlook on life.  Liam possesses the knowledge, self assurance and enlightenment of America’s greatest thinkers, writers, and spiritual leaders. He lives out his fantasies by escaping not into the world of drugs, used by our hip historians, but through the world of video games. By utilizing other technologies popular in today’s culture, Liam uses an ambiguous, coded language; one only he and his friends can decipher. The music he listens to, and ultimately wants to create is used as a way of communicating his hipness to the world. Liam rejects the religious orthodoxy of our community, and instead worships his own self-truth. Ultimately Liam’s intellect sets him apart from the masses, and will bring about many changes in our nation’s future. All of these attributes are what defines hip to me, but even Leland says, “You decide what is hip and what is not” (8). There is no vote or score card created to tally what is hip for one person to another. However Liam says, “hip is a perception,” if this is true, only you have the self-awareness to decide what is hip.







Works Cited:
The Dalai Lama, His Holiness. Many Ways to Nirvana. Ed. Renuka Singh. New York: Penguin
Compass, 2004. Print.
Leland, John. Hip: The History. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2004. Print.
Kerouac, Jack. On The Road. New York: Penguin Books, 2008. Print.
Whitman, Walt. Song of Myself. 1819-1892. Web. 26 Jan. 2011.

Monday, March 14, 2011

Annotated Bibliography

Jerri Benson
Professor Scott Weaver
English 201
14 March 2011
Essay #2:The Shape “Hip” Takes:
Annotated Bibliography

Carlin, George. When Will Jesus Bring the Pork Chops. New York: Hyperion, 2004. Print.

Carlin is a philosopher and nonconformist humorist that once was charged with legal action by the FCC and was determined by the Supreme Court as being “indecent but not obscene.” This book highlights his use of euphemistic language and how it relates to social and political issues. He enlightens the reader about the human condition, and passes his own knowledge and wisdom through humor. Carlin is controversial, contradictory, and is the very essences of what hip is.

Ellison, Ralph. Change the Joke and Slip the Yoke. The World Publishing Co., Spring 1958.
Partisian Review. Class handout.

Ellison’s essay unmasks the identity of the trickster. He does this through the use of enlightenment and self knowledge and how the joke lies between the cracks of societies traditions.  I will tie Ellison’s essay on the trickster to Leland’s definition, how it relates to the other texts in this bibliography, and ultimately how the trickster defines hip.

Ginsberg, Allen. Howl. Ed. Julia Reidhead. Vol. E. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2007.
Print. 7 vols.

Howl is a poem that defines the nonconformity of the beat generation. The ambiguous language shows the chaos of the world around them, and then points its finger back at the truth, enlightening societies of its flaws. Ginsberg exploits his own sexual identity and challenges the orthodoxy of the times. Howl defines the hipster, who is a rebel and owns his imperfections unforgivingly.

Leland, John. Hip: The History. New York: HarperCollins, 2004. Print.

I will be using Leland‘s book on the history of hip as a bridge between my definition of hip and how it relates to the other texts in this bibliography. I will be using his ideas on how language, identity, knowledge, enlightenment, nonconformity, and unorthodoxy help shape what is considered hip. I will be tying this text and the others back to Leland’s idea of the trickster, and how this character plays into my definition of hip.

South Park Bigger, Longer and Uncut. Dir. Trey Parker. Paramount Pictures and Warner Bros.
present in Association with Comedy Central. 1999. DVD.

I will be using South Park the movie to help define my interpretation of hip. South Park pushes the viewer to question their knowledge about pop culture and morality, and breaks down the truth by challenging, and at times changing ideas. South Park’s unapologetic use of language examines the power of words and how culture defines the meanings of those words. This movie uses unorthodox and unconventional messages to enlighten the viewer of our flawed society. All of this is being done through the identity of fourth grade children.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Tricksters or Treaters


The Cartoon Creator Tricksters:

No one is safe, not religion, politics, prejudice, cliques, sex, and celebrities. Current fads are demonized; tough topics like abortion, gun rights, and government conspiracy are depicted by using the innocence of fourth grade boys to show the ridicules aspects of American politics and social culture.

Trey Parker and Matt Stone the creators of South Park use their creative powers to allow the viewer to escape into tales of “seemingly impossible situations,” that happened to be at times all too genuine realities.
In their episodes they usually have a stereotype and by the end of the show they show the two extremes to both sides. According to John Leland in “Hip: The History,” “The trickster goes on anybody’s side” (180), with Parker and Stone, they take this to the extreme.
The episode where Kyle’s family move to San Francisco pokes fun at people who find it “hip” to purchase green cars, or hybrids, and they were so smug they enjoy the smell of their own farts. This shows extreme green mentality can be taken too far. Leland says, “Where you find smugness, you find something worth blasting” (178), this is what Parker and Stone are famous for, and the pun was not intended.
Even episodes that deal with religion, like the one where Cartman turns the popularity of The Passion of the Christ into a revival of the Nazi Movement, this episode says that Americans are easily swayed to prejudices and bigotry.
Leland says, “Tricksters pick on the weak as well as the strong” (169), Parker and Stone do the same. Not even the disabled community is safe. In the “Cripple Fight” episode, it takes our view of disabled people as frail and fragile and turns it on its ear. Or the one where Nurse Gullum has an unborn fetus attached to her head, the message of this episode was how disabled people do not want to be put into the spot light, and want to be treated like everyone else.
One of the main reasons the South Park creators are tricksters, is you think you know what their message is at the beginning of the show, but by the end even you are not sure what the message is, only that you may agree with them, this is the power of the con artist. They cut though the social mores and play within the grey areas of each episode. By using humor, wit and the ability to manipulate language they take stereotypes of American culture and undermine the rules of society.


Monday, March 7, 2011

Spread The Word Not Venereal Diseases


WORD

to your mother……

For anyone who was unable, or unwilling to go to the English Club’s reading on Friday missed out on a great event, the only thing that was missing was you.

The silent auction had some great items being sold at bargain basement prices. You could have bid on a private concert with a renowned Idaho bagpiper, or could have snacked on a can of unicorn meat. You heard me right, canned unicorn meat; every bite was guaranteed to make you sparkle. Just think this was just the beginning of the evening’s festivities.

Once the party really got started a young man, who will remain nameless, sauntered to the podium and told the crowd a story about “Green Assholes,” interesting title huh…..well you should have heard it, he had the crowd rolling in the isles with his witty tale of discolored body parts.

Next up into the spotlight was Tom (no relation to the cat), who tantalized us with metaphors, alliteration, and assonance that equaled the greats, names like Shakespeare, Eliot, and Thomas crept to mind. The only thing missing to this poetry reading was the beret and snapping fingers.

The only female reader of the night, announced that she would try not to puke or pass out on the crowd (I’m sure due to her obvious drinking problem), and spoke words of death, diet, and Wes Welker.

The last student, Mr. Wetzler read a short story that channeled Dave Barry; it was a tale of his hood, the crazy antics of the neighbors, and farm animals. His story was touching (I don’t mean what the neighbors were doing to the farm animals).

Matthew Haynes, published author, stylish dresser, and top notch professor, dazzled us all with a literary version of Faces of Death, then finished off the evening with two poignant tales, of a friend dying of cancer and his nephew who lost his life in Iraq. I tell you this man can write a moving story.

I’m not sure what happened after I left (I was sobering up and had to get back to the bar), but knowing this crowd, they partied like it was 1999.

I now challenge all of you English Majors (and even you others), to attend the Word event in April, your life will be forever altered.


Wednesday, March 2, 2011

The Perfection of Imperfection

According to Leland in, Hip: The History, the Beats believed in the perpetual present in order to not have to deal with anything they had done in the past, because neither the past nor the future exists. Personally I’m all for letting your freak flag fly and your flaws being tattooed to your forehead, but art for me should have some rules and structure, your life should have some of the same.
Beat It Caveman:
I don’t think that the Beats were seeking imperfection, it just wasn’t important to them for it to be perfect. That is how living in the present affects the aesthetic; you don’t worry about the imperfections. Maybe we shouldn’t see the Beats as the golden age of hipness, we should see them for their lack of evolution, the Neanderthals of hip, and learn from their mistakes and not to strive for perfection, but considering the future when acting out in the present.
 It is easier to get through life if you accept your imperfections but it is irresponsible to live your life never thinking about the consequences of your actions. Look what happen to the Beats, they died at young ages, depressed and addicted.

Now For My Rant:
I feel like a preaching mom, but addiction and mental illness is not hip, it’s painful both to the afflicted and to the ones that love them, not only living in the present but carried through to the future.
In the book Leland says, “To live in the present tense is to claim forgiveness as you go, making peace with your flaws even as you erupt in new ones” (158). I do not think that the Beats did this, they may have been asking for forgiveness for their flaws, but they were obviously not at peace with themselves. They lived in a world contradictory to what they preached, drowning out their sorrows with drugs and alcohol, even Kerouac tried to pass “On the Road” off as flawed or imperfect for its lack of revisions, when he indeed did revise.
Neither people nor art needs to be perfect, some of the greatest creations may come from someone’s mistakes. I also do not think that art should be treated carelessly, or I guess for that matter either should you treat yourself.

Art In Today’s World:
I think you would be hard pressed to find someone like the Beats in current artists today. There are artist today who are terribly flawed as people, but in their art they do strive for perfection. Maybe artist today learned from the Beat generation, and know how to embrace mistakes when they happen, but also know that there are consequences in the future for these mistakes. For me if I was to choose someone who reminded me of the Beats it would be:



Courtney Love, flawed on the inside and out, her music is raw and fearless, she is self-destructive, she makes no excuses for herself, and has no concept of any time other than right now in the present.